Pushed to defend his planned mass sackings of prison educators after Federation successfully forced a parliamentary debate on the issue, Corrections Minister David Elliott made hollow claims his new “model” would double inmate literacy rates.
The 14,000-strong Federation petition presented to parliament on October 20 through shadow minister for corrections Guy Zangari called on the Baird government to review its decision to expunge 132.5 of 152.5 full-time teaching roles — 85 per cent of teachers — to make way for clerks and private-provider trainers to run education in prisons.
“The government knows the cost of everything but the value of nothing — especially the value of educators within the Corrections system,” Mr Zangari, Labor MP for Fairfield, said, gesturing towards the gallery packed with Federation members and praising the “passionate” teachers.
The turbulent debate that followed saw speeches in favour of Federation’s petition from Labor MP Jihad Dib (Lakemba) and Greens MP Jenny Leong (Newtown) among others while the Speaker ejected Labor MP Prue Car over her energetic defence of Federation’s position and threatened to send out Mr Elliott, demanding, “Does the Minister for Corrections wish to join the Member for Londonderry?”
Mr Elliott attempted to explain the government’s decision by saying the current teachers “do a great job” but “the problem is we have the wrong model”.
With his “new model”, he claimed inmates completing literacy and numeracy courses would “more than double” to 1840 a year while inmates doing VET courses would increase by a fifth.
Federation Organiser Rob Long debunked the claims, saying Mr Elliott planned to employ so few teachers that the results he talked about lacked credibility.
“We have information that the tender contract for the delivery of education and training will be for 40,300 hours a year,” Mr Long said.
“The indicative sum of teaching hours this year is 89,474. This points to a drop of 49,174 teaching contact hours — a 55 per cent cut in hours — in the new model.
“How will the Minister manage a doubling of results when the workforce is going to be halved?”
Mr Long challenged Mr Elliott’s accusation that the teachers’ 11 weeks of leave entitlement was “not efficient use of the potential hours available” and that it was important “to deliver year-round services”.
In fact, said Mr Long, following negotiations, Corrective Services teachers this year had been staggering their leave so that fully 50 weeks of the year were teaching weeks.
“There are complex reasons why prisoners might not be able to use learning facilities in gaol,” Mr Long pointed out. They include:
- lockdowns: a shortage of prison officers meant entire gaols or wings were sent into lockdown with prisoners confined to cells, deprived of access to classes. Recently there was a three-day lockdown at Silverwater CC due to insufficient prison guard numbers;
- gaol employment: all inmates had to work and this impeded access to education, especially when there was a rush to finish contracted work;
- rehabilitation programs: a high number of prisoners have drug and alcohol dependency and violent behaviour and attend programs to identify and resolve these problems. Programs range from 50 to 100-plus hours for medium to high-intensity risk behaviour. There are also programs for mental illness, sex offending etc. All these erode time available for education;
- embarrassment: prisoners have low literacy and numeracy skills (two-thirds have writing and numeracy skills lower than a 15-year-old) and are reluctant to display this weakness in a tough gaol environment by signing up for classes. “I knew many guys who were young, even into their thirties, who couldn’t read, and embarrassment was a big factor in them not taking up classes,” former inmate John Killick confirmed (see his full story below).
Mr Long said the most rational and efficient action the Corrections Minister could take was to fill current vacancies in teacher and prison officer posts and increase the number of identified Aboriginal teaching positions.
In parliament, MP Dib said MPs “should not kid themselves for a moment that [the Baird government’s plan] was not simply about cost-cutting and lowering the standards for education delivery”. The government was inflicting this policy on the “most vulnerable” people in society.
News emerged last month that a computerised system would be installed to test prisoners before they attend classes and that external private providers would assess writing skills.
Fed Rep at Wellington CC, Janet Smith, warned online testing would not accurately gauge writing skills, where inmates were more vulnerable, than with reading and numeracy skills.
The computerised tests suggest a higher level of literacy than prisoners actually possess, which in turn could reduce services.
Click here for PDF of this story.